Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Arthur Miller's use of capitalism in death of a salesman Research Paper

Arthur Miller's use of capitalism in death of a salesman - Research Paper Example He held on to the former taught business ideals of individualism from the previous generation to use in the present, which could not be acceptable revolutionized society. According to Karim, Willy’s failure resulted from his inability to revolve but continued to apply the ‘winner take all business’ principle in an urban society that was passed that stage (67). One could consider him as an outdated individual who clings in the past knowledge in the hope that he can attain a goal, even after having to depend on the same wisdom in the past. He believed that winning the trust and likeness from the society, was the ultimate way to achieve his long waited success. However in the past, as the transition from old ways were been replaced by the modern methods of conducting businesses, Willy as one of the American people who held on to the former faith of individualism, as an early frontier ethic in business had the several opportunities of his former success, but he could no longer manage to compete in the climate of the business that was favored by capitalism. Everyone plans to live a happy and satisfied life. However the means to achieve the desire varies in different personalities. For some, even if it takes illegal means, it does not matter as long as the end goal is achieved. Others prefer honesty and integrity as a moral character and value. This was what directed the history of America towards certain individuals’ success before capitalism in early 19th Century, as illustrated by the stories told, for whatever it took to become successful (Cullen 60). Willy Loman was no different, and he strived hard in his sales job to sustain his family, and fulfill his desires of living an American dream. His Social status best expressed as a middle class was accompanied with hardship in acquiring wealth, and hence he had to depend on how the society would take him, based on likeness for him to thrive in the sales job. The principle of self made man, and though being helpful before, failed as capitalist would attain the American dream more easily than using the former strategy. The growing capitalism taking over in the business world forced Willy out of the sales job, because it came with better ways of producing and distributing goods, for much more profit that Willy could not keep up with. Loman suffers frustration after been declined for a job knowing he had retired as a salesman, which he struggled tirelessly all through his life. Through capitalism, power is associated with capitalist like Howard, who dares fire Willy after his long service in the company, without even minding the moral decency of setting him aside for retirement (Sterling 5). Indications of an old car, non profit making individual, and financial struggles show that his financial status was worse to raise capital, so that he could start a business of his own closer to home. As an investor, Howard hoped for delivery of an efficient service as he also paid w ages to his workers, which determined his profit too. As a capitalist, it would then be arguable whether Willy’s firing was justified or not. The aim of capitalism is to acquire more profits after sales and production. Capitalism will make use of the working class to efficiently expand the profit margin,

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Visual Arts and Film Studies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Visual Arts and Film Studies - Essay Example Discussion of Greek architecture and the various stages of development that it went through and the impact of those developments on their art and artifacts is the focal point of this paper. To attain the objective and to compare the variation in art pertaining to two different periods of the same civilization, pottery has been decided to be focused upon. Tabular Comparison Part II Visual Analysis The above figure is a front view comparison of the two pieces of pottery selected for this paper. In the above figure the two pieces of art are distinguished and deconstructed into 4 major and prominent factions from the front view. Tabular comparison covers the differences between the two pieces of art in detail; however a frontal view comparison is as follows. The two pieces of art can be distinguished into A= Neck, B= Handle, C= Belly and D= Base. In figure A it can be observed that the neck of the vase is slimmer and compliments the imagery that is present drawn on the body of the vase w hereas in figure B the neck is wider and once again provides a balance symmetry with the overall orientation of the amphora (Scott, 2004). The handles in both the pieces of art are different in their structure, shape and inclination and perhaps purpose as well. In figure A we can see that the handles are an extension of the vase and are not an additional inclusion in the structure of the pot. The handles are part of the design of the vase. In comparison to Fig A, handles in figure B are not highlighted in the frontal view. From the front view only edges of the handles are observable while in figure A frontal view clearly shows the features of the handles (Scott, 2004). Part C in both the pots is the Belly. In Figure A, belly is circular in its shape and is once again utilized by the artist to compliment the image that has been drawn on the body. On the other hand in Fig B the belly is elongated and is oval in its shape. Belly comprise the main proportion of the entire structure in b oth the pots but Figure A has a more radial shape of the belly in contrast to Fig B that is slender in its orientation. Part D in both the pots, as highlighted above is the base of the figure. There are similarities in the base of both the pieces of art as can be observed. The base appears to be solid and flat in both the pieces of art. Another aspect to be observed from a technical view point is the width of the base in both the figures is in accordance with the shape and size of the entire art work. In figure A the base is wider than that in Figure B and this variation in width can be associated to the fact that bellies in both the figures occupy a different volume and thus they require different widths of bases to form a balanced art structure (Scott, 2004). In the above table the two art works are deconstructed into various observable components. The differences in the orientation shape and design of the two art works clearly depicts the transformation that the art work and civi lization has come across over the passage of time (Lynch, 2005). Figura Activa refers to the active image that can be observed prominently in a piece of art. For figure A figura activa is identified to be an octopus. While in Figure B no prominent character can be identified however circular lines along the horizontal axis are the only notable existence in the art work. Mesomorph is referred to as the overall expansion of the shape of an art